Year: 2013 Genre: Action, Fantasy, Horror Director: Tommy Wirkola Starring: Jeremy Renner, Gemma Arterton, Famke Janssen
Description: Hansel and Gretel is a killer track and kill witches all over the world. As the moon approaches the legendary Blood, siblings, a new form of evil that can keep a secret of his past. Review: It's a simple action movie. The short running time 1 hour and 28 minutes, you can expect moves quickly and is filled with lots of action.The story: The film begins with a young Hansel and Gretel lose their parents. They are shortly collected witches to eat. Can they escape and burn the witch alive and that's what they become witch hunters. Cue the opening credits. Another scene shows save an innocent woman who is accused of being witches. And from there, running further action. There are some small twists on innocent women and Gretels Janko and parents. Other than that, it is only easy for a good cause. The action scenes are not bad, but they are particularly serious fantastic. Music wise is pretty good with Han Zimmer music acts as supervisor.3D: Okay. Like many scenes take place at night, 3D cushioning effect. It becomes more and more difficult to see. But when it comes to explosions, splashes of blood and action, is a publicity stunt flying objects to your face. Other than that, the 3D is not recommended if you have some spare money.Overall: Not bad in January. Sure, there is a strong possibility that the film never comes, but Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters will not be disappointed if you want a good action-packed fun. Another film fairy tale Jack the Giant Slayer in February
Description: Two years after the bachelor party in Las Vegas, Phil, Stu, Alan and Doug jet to Thailand for Stus wedding. However Stus plan for a subdued pre-wedding brunch goes seriously wrong. Review: The Hangover Part 2 is a great movie with a great story, cast, characters and some very funny scenes.I think it's a great result, that lives up to the first and I think it is very under-critics, though it is certainly not better for first.Hovever borrows a lot from original.Theres more wedding, bachelor party, and still is, Phil, Stu and Alan wake up the next morning with no memory of the next night, seems to be a darker version original.Hovever I still think it was great, I never I can not say no to these characters is just ridiculous, and I would be happy to see Zach Galifanakis, Ed Helms and Bradley Cooper play when sixty I'd like to marry much.Stu Thailand.Stu, Phil, Alan and Doug Stus soon vifes brother goes to a bachelor party the night before vedding.Thei wake up the next morning in Bangkok no memory the next night, brother missing.Once again to track their steps before the big days.
Description: Four college girls who land in jail after robbing a restaurant to fund their spring break vacation find themselves bailed by drug and arms dealer who wants them to do the dirty work. Review: Faith, played by Selema Gomez and his three close friends escape plan their lives boring college dorm to attend a mass spring break party. To pay his departure, his three friends made an unthinkable act of terror. Their spring break vacation ends up being a non-stop party of drug intoxication and sexual perversion he lands in jail. This is when abroad, played by James Franco, who kept alive the esperançai a new kind of game from a softcore porn video sequence begins.With first dub-step, do not know Spring Breakers if he glorifies the activities portrayed or demoralizing it is a satire. Even when the film does not seem to flash images of Girls Gone Wild Spring Break special, and we're with the girls, the definition seems to have been done by a sex addict. This will be one of the most uncomfortable Selema Gomez fans will ever experience. For parents, it will be a nightmare. Young male audience, however, think they've found their new favorite movie. When children are introduced to foreign film looks like it has a new director. The feeling of a narrative film Girls Gone Wild is lost and we filled a great sense of fear. Who is this guy called abroad? Still we are afraid to find out what is planned for these young people, who are rescued from prison.As continue until the second half of the film, it becomes clear that we are actually seeing a satire. The terrible satire and efficient. This is done by exposing the nature of foreign credit and was much given to James Franco, who is at his best. Throughout the film will be afraid to laugh at him, feeling sorry for him. The film is worth watching just for the Franks performance. The girls do a great job too. These are easily two of the most terrifying female characters ever put screen.Spring Breakers is written and directed by Harmony Korine, the writer and director of Gummo child. If you've seen something you have written or directed you know what awaits you. Has a history of heart Natural Born Killers wrapped in layers of Terrence Malick directed would be Girls Gone Wild. What ends up becoming an annoying distraction is the repetition of dialogue to listen to again and again, playing on a loop. We note that girls shoes, things are out of control and editing help convey that. Some of these works, but in the end, we have often heard the same things as Korine is hammering the message of his satire on the head, almost desperate to prove that he is right. Through the history of its meaning is clear, there is no reason to overuse certain Malick, such as editing techniques to overcome the historically been, Ria has obvious.The central story is a genius. The way the story is told is divided between things play out as a master at work and experiencing a new filmmaker.
Description: No. FBI special agent with a bad-mouth the Boston Police Drug Lord is ruthless.No. FBI special agent with a bad-mouth the Boston Police Drug Lord is ruthless. Review: There were gags from beginning to end and the film got funnier as it went. McCarthy finally focuses on high performance, it's fun and crazy with great sensitivity oxen. One of my favorite things about this film is that they understand his comedic take on the police / fed history, the reason is that it is important that the film lose or invest in characters that are really well played out, and unlike other films, including niche end will leave you satisfied with the film, rather than feeling that something is missing or ended too quickly and it was bad written.All the film a big maybe put pen to paper and get more to do because it will definitely watch.
Description: check Wolverines early life, especially his time with the government armed force and effect it has on his later years. Review: The original X-Men was very character-driven, focused heavily on the development of the characters? And he had to. X-Men 2 nice built on myths. X-Men 3 was free to leave holdovers from the first two films to run Amok while the story feels a little crowded. This film feels like a nice comp admiration of all three. He receives an advantage, because it is a well-tempered introduction of new characters mixed with a perfect focus on the character of Wolverine. The action sequences are really guarantee serious praise. The origin is incorrect complicate conventional black and white tropes of good versus evil, but it should not be. What is is extremely satisfying thrill ride!
Year: 2012 Genre: Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi Director: Gary Ross Starring: Stanley Tucci, Jennifer Lawrence, Liam Hemsworth
Description: Katniss Everdeen voluntarily takes her younger sisters in the Hunger Games, a fight to the death televised, in which two young people from each of the twelve districts of Panem are chosen at random to compete. Review: The Hunger Games trilogy of all time, without a doubt one of the best series of novels for young adults. The movie Hunger Games is one of the worst book-to-film adaptations of all time.The potential that had this film is indescribable. I was excited with anticipation for this adjustment pounds and say that I was disappointed is the understatement of the year. It looks pretty much the writers just read the Spark Notes version of the book and decided to fill in the gaps themselves. Details seemed to be changed, where you look, and its usually for the worse. Despite the fact that the execution time of the film is well over 2 hours, the characters are extremely weak and important points of the story are left in all directions. Just as I sit here writing this review, I myself and the people with whom I first saw midnight with coming up with more and more things in the book that were either modified or omitted from the film. Even though I could sit here and an infinite number of plot points wrong in the film, I'll just say the list that the only thing that pleased me the best part: You do not even show or say anything about AVOX HAIRED RED GIRL yearbook further from the link I, the more I get angry in this review. It just seems like everything is wrong. The muttations were even remotely close to what they were, as described in the book. The last action sequence was true to the book? in my opinion? was bored and had no action on the rise. It 'just happened. No climax. No action falls. This is actually more or less like the whole movie was. It 'was like a straight line from start to finish.Personally, I love previews midnight. The audience is alive and advertised? ultimately create a wonderful viewing experience. The Hunger Games has been named the new generations of Harry Potter, and if this is true, I fear, for the new generation. If you've ever had the privilege to see a Harry Potter before midnight, you know that there are countless moments in which the audience burst into thunderous applause when a major plot point happens. This did not happen with Hunger Games. Not once. In more than disappointed. Im not quite sure I want to see, Catching Fire, when they had to decide to make a film for all three books. It 's totally confusing to me, as in a Harry Potter movie is more to the book in the same (or less) of the time, regardless of other pages with 400 +. The end is completely incomprehensible. What has happened? In the book, Katniss and Peeta are already growing distant and suspicious of one another, but in the film it seems as if everything is peachy. The writers really messed up the story to the point where I wonder how you can even try, Catching Fire take the big screen. At the end of the movie Katniss and Peeta are all smiles as they want to turn sudden conflict in the sequel? The Hunger Games trilogy was interested only to fail again if you do not often already.So of people, you feel the book was better. Usually these people are just arrogant, but in this case it's true. Rarely, if ever a film is not greater than his literary counterpart, but it should at least as a standard for a movie, only to be at par with the book in terms of quality. Looking back on the film now, 30 minutes later, I'm not able to recommend a single memorable attribute.This I remind you: read the book. Even if you have seen the movie, read the book. Let your imagination create the scenes. Do not be too disappointed as me. I do not expect recommend this movie to all my friends who have read the book. In the minds and hearts of many, The Hunger Games books are sacred. This film serves the emotional connection you have to dim without emotions with the book simply providing images.
Year: 2013 Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy Director: Sam Raimi Starring: James Franco, Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz
Description: A small time magician carried to an enchanted land and forced into a power struggle between the three witches. Review: Do not usually write reviews, but I feel compelled to write something about this film. I saw some negative publicity about this movie and I noticed that there were some low scores in the vote. I have to say that in relation to these people, you are stupid. The movie was almost perfect for what it meant to be, a family film about a magical place. There were some honest mistakes in the plot for the relationship between the main characters, but they were more creative differences and I do not have a full blown errors. Moreover, the film was brilliant and it was the most pleasant and surprisingly funny, and it is ridiculous. The film was a credit to the legend of L Frank Baum and the legend of The Wizard of Oz. I do not think that this film has no hope of such success of The Wizard of Oz, but it was far beyond the typical garbage produced in Hollywood these days. I receive a girlfriend, boyfriend, children, mom, dad, or whoever and see it, you will have fun and have some laughs as well. Thank you for reading my review and God bless.
Year: 2013 Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy Director: Sam Raimi Starring: James Franco, Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz
Description: A magician to be dragged into a land haunted house and is forced to a power struggle between three witches. Review: I usually write comments, but I feel compelled to write something about this movie. I saw some negative publicity about this movie and I noticed that there were some low scores in the election. I have to say respect for these people, you're stupid. The movie was almost perfect for what was supposed to be a family film about a magical place. There were a few mistakes made in the plot of the relationship between the main characters, but they were creative differences and I do not want a full blown error. In addition, the film is brilliant and was the most pleasant surprise and fun way, and I think fun. The film is a credit to the legend L. Frank Baum and the Wizard of Oz legend. I think this movie has hope for that kind of success Wizard of Oz had, but this is far beyond the typical garbage produced in Hollywood these days. I'm telling you girl, boy, child, mother, father, or whoever and see it, you'll have fun and get some laughs too. Thank you for reading my review and God bless you.
Year: 2013 Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy Director: Guillermo del Toro Starring: Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi
Description: As between humanity and monstrous sea creatures salary, a former pilot and trainee war is twin create a special weapon apparently exceeded desperately trying to save the world from apocalypse. Review: I just watch the Pacific Rim on the premiere of the first day / time place in 3D. Yes, I'm a nerd. But that's not the whole thing. If you have experienced the excitement of watching movies animated robots against monsters in childhood, this is a perfect movie for you. Kaiju monsters design reminds me of the evil monsters Godzillas in conjunction with the Cloverfield monster, Xenomorph (Alien), and TRON. As for robots Jeager, ill let you decide if they are good or very good. :) To watch this movie, I needed to change my attitude will be like ten 10 robot child this year, as 29 years ago. Because if you do, you will feel very disappointed and question marks with this film. The story is quite predictable. Scheme and rhythm are simple enough for children to understand. But a fool and that appearances are somewhat annoying to me Professor. But hey, that's what it is all about: to celebrate the memory of children against monsters.Overall robots, the film is great for fans of animated monsters against robots. It is not even close to that awful Transformers eBay Michael.
Year: 2013 Genre: Drama, Thriller Director: Paul Schrader Starring: Lindsay Lohan, James Deen, Nolan Gerard Funk
Description: When the Christians, or random-fund kid, whenever he turns to The Hollywood confidence, he learns of his film project in secret, between the subject and the lead, Tara, Ryan and spiral out of control, and escalate their acts of cruel mind games with blood. Review: View these stars Lindsay Lohan and the train-wreck porn star James Deen, the long knives coming out for the film before he finished taping. With all the bad press, I expected amateurish mess. One important thing I got from this movie was that the approach is professional made.The movie looks good. Lindsay Lohan is ... well ... Lindsay. Shes probably not going to win any awards, but she still screen presence. James Deen makes a good asshole. Maybe it's just his real personality. All fit their roles. Lindsay is emotionally damaged former star cool. Deen is sexually perverse. They can be used as well their one real thing names.The I wish they would improve in establishing greater risk in the beginning. Foreshadowing would better enhance the excitement. Instead, it is a strict linear timeline and the start of the film rather slow. It does not really begin to move to the middle of the movie. Overall, its a good bet for a low budget indie.
20 
3
